Research, Studies & Evaluation tenders in Russia

746 open notices

Baseline and endline studies, impact evaluations, third-party monitoring, household surveys, feasibility and market studies, and applied policy research for development programmes.

Who buys research, studies & evaluation in Russia

These are the organisations with the most research, studies & evaluation notices open in Russia right now. Buyers in this sector tend to repeat — following the few that award the work you do is usually more productive than watching the market as a whole.

Research, Studies & Evaluation market snapshot

Since 16 Sept 2026, FreeTender has recorded 3,413 research, studies & evaluation notices in Russia, 746 of them open today. The median bid window is 8 days, so plan to have documents ready before a notice appears. Where buyers state a value, the median is RUB 113 thousand (2,920 priced notices).

Notices on record: 3,413
Open now: 746
Median bid window: 8 days
Median stated value: RUB 113 thousand

143

3,216

SeptOctNov

Most active research, studies & evaluation buyers

Where the work is

Москва374 notices
Краснодарский край206 notices
Московская область202 notices
Санкт-Петербург195 notices
Самарская область128 notices
Свердловская область101 notices
Саратовская область99 notices
Ставропольский край84 notices
Новосибирская область83 notices
Кемеровская область83 notices

Procedures used

Request for quotation1,693 notices
Open tender1,276 notices
Request for proposal444 notices

Computed by FreeTender from the notices we hold, refreshed nightly. Monthly market reports.

How they buy

Across the research, studies & evaluation notices we currently hold for Russia, the most common form is the open tender or invitation to bid, followed by request for quotation and request for proposal. Each has its own rules — see RFP, RFQ and EOI compared and tendering procedures explained.

What qualifies you

Research and evaluation assignments are commissioned by UN agencies, development banks, bilateral donors and international NGOs, and are almost always awarded on quality-and-cost rather than price alone — commonly 70:30 or 80:20 in favour of the technical proposal. The decisive elements are the proposed methodology, the named team and the evaluator's independence from the programme being assessed. Expect to be asked for a sampling frame, an analysis plan, ethics and safeguarding arrangements for research with human subjects, and prior assignments of comparable scope. Terms of reference frequently name a specific framework — the OECD-DAC criteria for evaluations, or a donor's own results framework — and a proposal that ignores it loses marks that were freely available. Data ownership and publication rights normally sit with the commissioning agency; check whether you may cite the work later.

Before committing effort, it is worth running a deliberate bid/no-bid decision and checking your submission against the responsiveness checklist.